Posts
Khribga
film festival reveals controversial matters as far as film critics is concerned.Damoun,
a respected film critic says something dangerous about the list of winning
films .He states, "we know , as we go through the list of films participating
in our festivals and from the beginning
who is going to win and who will get the first prize".
I feel ashamed to hear about this
statement and fortunately I do not want to be a film critic, but I am concerned
about mentalities of our film critics. Take for example one of the best film
critic in France ,Pierre Murat .This French plume admits that he was a bad
teacher ,but he tries criticizing films and now he is good at this job. It is as simple as
it sounds.
Why can not Ahmed Boughaba, x-journalist; Omar Ait
Mokhtar x-something or simply
Moroccan
film critics coming from college and universities admit that they are called
just to fill the gap. They do not dare
to that because they do not want to miss Luxury hotels
and expensive wines, may be I hope I am wrong
Pierre along
with Damoun teach us how honest they are
what is true film critics by just saying that a film critic is passeur between
him and the auteur .His role is to discover just little tiny things in films
and then he must criticize in a objective way. So many film critics because
they lack sense of sharing passions with cinema goers , they try to make ugly
views in order to break down morals of good films and that's why many film
makers just do not like to follow critics coming from those mentioned before. A
film critic must reveal his point of view as far techniques and professionalism
of the films seen by him.
